Waymo Expands Services to Austin, Cruise Introduces Offering in Nashville, and Debunking the Geofence Myth

**Waymo and Cruise Expand into New Cities: Austin, TX and Nashville**

Waymo and Cruise, two prominent players in the self-driving space, recently announced their plans to expand into new cities. Waymo revealed that it would soon begin service in Austin, TX, while Cruise announced its intentions to serve Nashville. These expansions highlight the companies’ ability to scale and demonstrate their commitment to bringing autonomous driving technology to new markets.

**Competition in Austin: Waymo vs. Cruise**

One interesting aspect of Waymo’s decision to enter Austin is the presence of Cruise in the city. It is somewhat surprising to see Waymo pick a city where its competitor already operates. One would assume that when in full production, Waymo would prefer to operate without competition rather than going head-to-head. However, both companies are currently not in commercial operation and are pricing their services similarly to ride-hailing platforms like Uber. This suggests that financial reasons may not be the primary driving factor behind their expansions.

**Challenges and Arguments in the Self-Driving Space**

Supporters of Tesla’s Full Self-Driving (FSD) technology often argue that the company is a leader in the self-driving space because FSD operates in a supervised mode on almost all streets in the USA. In contrast, many robotaxi providers are geofenced to specific cities. While the level of service provided by these companies in their designated cities surpasses Tesla’s FSD performance, there are reasons for their geofenced operations.

**Unique Challenges Faced by Robotaxi Companies**

Robotaxi companies like Waymo and Cruise face several challenges when expanding into new areas. These challenges include gathering map data for the new location, testing the system in the new area, making arrangements with local governments, and having sufficient resources to support new customers. In contrast, driver-assist systems like Tesla’s FSD can rely on human drivers to handle unforeseen problems, giving them a significant advantage in terms of flexibility and operation.

**Different Approaches to Mapping and Navigation**

Tesla’s FSD system starts from a lane geometry map and attempts to build a more accurate map on-the-fly using sensor data. Many errors in the Tesla FSD system can be attributed to inaccuracies in the generated map. On the other hand, companies like Waymo and Cruise use a combination of computer vision, LIDARs, and radar for mapping on-the-fly. Their superior sensor suites allow them to handle changes in the environment more effectively.

**Scalability and Generalization**

Waymo claims that its techniques are highly scalable to different locations. Through the use of cutting-edge machine learning (ML), Waymo aims to build a system that can generalize from one place to another, enabling quicker scalability. This scalability and generalization play a crucial role in Waymo’s ability to expand into new cities efficiently.

**Tesla’s Data Advantage**

While Waymo and Cruise face challenges when expanding into new areas, Tesla leverages its extensive network of drivers who test out the FSD software. This vast user base provides Tesla with an advantage in terms of quickly and thoroughly certifying the system’s performance on different roads. The data generated by Tesla owners can be used to identify areas for improvement and train new machine learning models.


Waymo and Cruise’s expansion into new cities like Austin, TX, and Nashville demonstrates their commitment to bringing self-driving technology to more markets. While they face unique challenges in expanding their operations, they continue to develop and refine their systems. Tesla’s FSD technology, although operating on a larger scale, still falls short of the level of performance exhibited by companies like Waymo and Cruise. However, Tesla’s substantial user base provides valuable data that can contribute to the improvement of their self-driving capabilities. Overall, the race for autonomous driving technology continues, with each company striving to overcome challenges and deliver safe and reliable self-driving experiences.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

GIPHY App Key not set. Please check settings

Key Indicators of Performance for User-Centered Design

MrBeast, Famed YouTuber, Faces Accusations of Bullying from Delivery Firm Involved in Lawsuit