in

Waymo and Cruise Secure Robotaxi Permits for Full-Day Operations Across SF, LA, and Silicon Valley in Lucrative Move



**California PUC Approves Permits for Expansion of Robotaxi Operations**

The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) recently voted 3-1 in favor of approving permits for the expansion of robotaxi operations, despite opposition from officials in San Francisco. This decision opens up new possibilities for companies like Cruise and Waymo to offer enhanced services to the public. However, Commissioner Shiroma was the sole dissenter in this vote, and Commissioner Douglas was absent. In this article, we will delve into the details of the CPUC’s decision and its implications for robotaxi services in California.

**Expanded Services for Cruise and Waymo**

Under the newly approved permits, Cruise will be able to operate throughout the day in San Francisco, eliminating the previous restriction that limited their operations to nighttime hours. During the daytime, Cruise vehicles will be required to have a safety driver present and charge a fare for their services. On the other hand, Waymo will now be permitted to offer full operations on San Francisco streets, both day and night, with or without a safety driver, and will be able to charge fares without any restrictions. Waymo will also have the flexibility to provide free rides in certain areas of Los Angeles and the vicinity of Mountain View, regardless of whether there is a safety driver present.

**Commissioner Shiroma as the Lone Opponent**

Commissioner Shiroma stood alone in opposing the permits, expressing reservations about the potential impact of robotaxi services on the city. However, Commissioner Douglas was absent during the vote, which ultimately led to the approval of the permits. It is worth noting that public sentiment seemed fairly divided during the public presentations that preceded the vote. While there were numerous individuals who voiced their support or opposition to the robotaxis, it is unclear how much influence these comments had on the final decision. Campaigns from various stakeholders, including Waymo, Cruise, unions, Uber/taxi drivers, and representatives for the disabled, further added to the complexity of public opinion.

**Promotion of Waymo’s Waitlist Riders**

Waymo recently announced its plan to gradually promote riders from its extensive waitlist, which currently consists of over 100,000 individuals. However, this process will occur slowly over time, ensuring a controlled expansion of their services.

**Mixed Reactions within the City**

Both Cruise and Waymo have managed to attract a significant number of supporters as well as detractors within the city of San Francisco. These divisions were anticipated, as any major technological disruption is likely to face resistance and labor concerns. While the complaints of opponents should be acknowledged and addressed by the companies, it is important to note that public sentiment regarding these services is diverse. Advocates for the disabled, for example, expressed their disappointment that the promised exceptional service has yet to materialize. Additionally, unions and cycling enthusiasts can be found on both sides of the argument. Despite efforts from the fire department to derail the permits, their impact appears to have been minimal.

**Service Expansion Details Awaited**

While the approved permits allow for the expansion of robotaxi services in San Francisco, no specific information has been provided regarding their availability in Silicon Valley or Los Angeles. Further updates from the companies involved are necessary to determine the extent of their expansion plans in these areas.

**Waymo Addresses Recent Incident**

Waymo recently confirmed that a reported incident involving one of their vehicles and a car fire was accurate. As per the San Francisco Fire Department’s account, the Waymo vehicle was parked between the fire truck and the burning car when it needed to be manually moved. Waymo clarified that a second fire truck arrived from the opposite direction, limiting the vehicle’s movement. However, it is important to note that the vehicle was unoccupied, and the fire department only requested a manual movement after extinguishing the fire.

In conclusion, the CPUC’s approval of permits for the expansion of robotaxi operations in California has paved the way for enhanced services from companies like Cruise and Waymo. While there were objections from officials in San Francisco, the majority of the commission voted in favor of the permits. The varied perspectives and concerns from the public highlight the importance of addressing the needs and expectations of different stakeholders, such as disabled individuals and labor unions. The future expansion of these services in Silicon Valley and Los Angeles remains to be seen, but the recent developments mark a significant step forward in the deployment of autonomous vehicles for public transportation.



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

GIPHY App Key not set. Please check settings

Photography Amidst Ethiopia’s War-Torn Landscape: Eduardo Soteras Jalil’s Journey – Exit Strategy Podcast 043

Louisville Educational Institutions Suspend Classes Following ‘Transportation Catastrophe’ Involving Buses